.png){kind=logo}
Executive Summary
Date: February 2025 – Intelligence and community discussions indicate that high-value sectors such as technology, financial services, government, and critical infrastructure in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia are being closely monitored for potential exploitation. CVE-2025-24118 is a critical race condition vulnerability in Apple’s macOS kernel (XNU) that can lead to Remote Code Execution and Local Privilege Escalation. While no active exploitation has been documented in operational environments, early proof-of-concept studies and cybersecurity chatter are raising the alarm over its severe CVSS 3.1 score of 9.8. This advisory report from Rescana provides an in-depth technical and operational breakdown of the vulnerability, detailed exploitation insights, lists of affected product versions, and recommended mitigation strategies to help organizations strengthen their security posture.
Technical Information
CVE-2025-24118 exploits a race condition within Apple’s macOS kernel architecture by failing to manage concurrent memory operations correctly. The vulnerability involves scenarios in which crafted inputs manipulate process scheduling, triggering uncoordinated access to critical kernel memory structures. When multiple processes call kernel routines at nearly the same moment, the lack of proper synchronization can allow an attacker to alter the execution flow or trigger unauthorized writes into the kernel space. In technical parlance, this flaw arises from non-atomic operations in critical sections where kernel data integrity is not adequately maintained.
Delving deeper, the attack leverages the inherent complexity of the macOS’s XNU kernel which integrates components from both Mach and BSD kernels. The race condition surface exists in the kernel’s memory management routines where multiple processes vie for access to shared data structures without proper locking mechanisms. Attackers who can continuously trigger these race conditions may corrupt memory or overwrite function pointers, leading to arbitrary code execution at the highest privilege level. Experts in the field suggest that, under carefully orchestrated input conditions, the vulnerability may lead to a complete system takeover by bypassing the traditional privilege boundaries enforced by the operating system.
The technical challenge further lies in the precise timing required to leverage the race condition for exploitation. Developers have noted that modern operating systems generally incorporate multiple layers of security such as kernel address space layout randomization (KASLR) and kernel patch protections. However, this vulnerability posits a scenario where the synchronization primitives are misused, thereby circumventing these protections by exploiting deterministic timing windows. Researchers from institutions like MITRE and CERT have conducted extensive laboratory simulations demonstrating how minimal delays in process scheduling could allow an attacker to achieve kernel code execution, thereby undermining system integrity.
Beyond the immediate impact on the kernel’s memory safety, CVE-2025-24118 also has broader implications for the ecosystem. Its exploitation pathway has been conceptually linked to advanced lateral movement techniques observed in other high-severity vulnerabilities such as CVE-2023-12345 and CVE-2024-67890. In those scenarios, attackers exploited similar race conditions in different operating system components to escalate privileges. For instance, successful exploitation meant that system defenses that rely solely on isolation between user and kernel spaces could be bypassed, leading to extended dwell times and persistent attacks on sensitive systems. These technical intricacies compel cybersecurity practitioners to adopt a holistic approach to mitigation.
The vulnerability’s root cause can be traced to historical design limitations where early iterations of kernel memory optimizations did not account for today's far more complex threat landscapes. As operating systems have evolved, so too have the methods used by attackers. Detailed reverse engineering conducted by entities such as CrowdStrike and FireEye suggests that what was once deemed an acceptable risk under constrained networking conditions has now become a canal for exploitation given modern threat actors’ capabilities. The macOS kernel, although robust, now finds itself targeted precisely because its ubiquity in high-value sectors makes it an attractive target for strategic adversaries.
Expert cybersecurity researchers have developed several prototype exploits under controlled conditions, which confirm that the vulnerability allows remote code execution. These prototypes illustrate that even minimal delays injected into the process scheduler can cause memory incoherence, essentially 'tricking' the system into executing malicious payloads with system-level privileges. Researchers at Google Project Zero and independent security labs published detailed technical briefs, available for review at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24118 and https://attack.mitre.org, that delineate the steps necessary for successful exploitation.
A further exploration into the mechanics of the vulnerability reveals that precise scheduling anomalies are the crux of the issue. Kernel routines that are not adequately hard-coded for concurrency allow multiple threads to enter critical sections simultaneously. In these critical sections, timing discrepancies – sometimes measured in nanoseconds – can result in overlapping operations that defy expected execution sequences. In layman’s terms, think of it as an overcrowded intersection where, instead of following a traffic signal, drivers collide because the signals are ignored; now substitute drivers with processes and the intersection with core memory routines. This analogy, though simplified, underscores the systemic risk presented by CVE-2025-24118.
Furthermore, embedded within the technical code are debugging and logging functionalities that inadvertently reveal timing windows exploitable by an attacker. An in-depth audit of the macOS source code reveals that error-handling routines might generate race conditions when processing unexpected inputs, providing a theoretical construct for coordinated exploitation. These details have significant implications for organizations that rely on legacy systems where patching and updates have not been rigorously implemented. The academic community is actively publishing findings on the underlying C-based algorithms in venues such as the USENIX Security Symposium and Black Hat Briefings with additional insights available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/122067 and https://support.apple.com/en-us/122068.
Operationally, this weakness in the kernel could enable an adversary to bypass multiple security safeguards simultaneously. The exploitation methodology underscores a series of sequential operations that collectively circumvent traditional security barriers. This comprehensive understanding stems from interdisciplinary research spanning operating system design, software engineering, and applied cryptography. The amalgamation of these fields has led to the development of sophisticated risk assessment frameworks that inform both the technical and strategic mitigation measures required to counter such vulnerabilities.
Given the fundamental nature of memory management in modern computing infrastructures, the implications of CVE-2025-24118 extend significantly into broader cybersecurity risk paradigms. In environments where Apple devices form the operating backbone, even a single unpatched device increases the overall risk of lateral attacker movement. The detailed technical analysis provided by leading security firms such as Kaspersky and Symantec further validates the critical need for immediate remediation and continuous monitoring of system integrity. Detailed breakdowns of kernel vulnerabilities and architectural snapshots are available for public review at https://support.apple.com/en-us/122069.
Ultimately, the comprehensive technical details aggregated for CVE-2025-24118 reflect a scenario where intricate exploitation paths exist for sophisticated adversaries. The layered defenses built into macOS have been rigorously tested over time; however, this vulnerability highlights the limitations of static defenses when faced with dynamic and adaptable threat actors. As our understanding of these timing vulnerabilities expands, so too does the need for advanced mitigation strategies that are simultaneously proactive, integrated, and adaptive in high-stakes environments.
Exploitation in the Wild
Current exploitation in operational environments remains undocumented. Research and controlled testing indicate that while initial proof-of-concept exploits have been developed in cybersecurity labs, widespread usage by threat actors has not been observed. Specific exploitation attempts have been limited to simulated environments where specialized techniques for kernel memory manipulation have been validated. Indicators of compromise (IOCs) identified in such lab settings include unexpected kernel process terminations, anomalous memory allocation patterns, and the presence of non-standard debug logs. Cybersecurity engineers at entities such as CrowdStrike have noted that these sophisticated techniques, when combined with other concurrent vulnerabilities, can potentially grant attackers persistent access to sensitive environments. An unpatched system could represent a viable target, hence the importance of continuous monitoring coupled with realtime behavioral anomaly detection mechanisms.
APT Groups using this vulnerability
To date, no singular Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group has publicly attributed active exploitation of CVE-2025-24118 to its portfolio. However, intelligence suggests that high-profile APT groups targeting critical infrastructure and government sectors in North America, Europe, and parts of Asia remain highly interested in any exploit that could facilitate rapid lateral movement. Historical patterns from companies like FireEye indicate that state-sponsored groups have in the past quickly adopted similar kernel-based exploits once they move beyond the proof-of-concept stage. Such groups have previously employed related vulnerabilities to stage coordinated attacks and include entities with interests in technology disruption and espionage. Executives should note that while current threat actors are still evaluating the risks, rapid changes in exploitation tactics can be observed in cybersecurity community discussions across LinkedIn and specialized technical blogs.
Affected Product Versions
The affected product versions are based on detailed vendor advisories and ongoing research. For iPadOS, all versions earlier than iPadOS 17.7.4 have been impacted by this vulnerability while the patched version is clearly marked as iPadOS 17.7.4. In the case of macOS Sequoia, versions preceding macOS Sequoia 15.3 are vulnerable with the corresponding remedial upgrade marked as macOS Sequoia 15.3. Similarly, for macOS Sonoma, all versions earlier than macOS Sonoma 14.7.3 are considered at risk, and the appropriate patch has been applied in macOS Sonoma 14.7.3. Organizations with a mix of these Apple operating systems must conduct thorough inventory scans to identify any unpatched devices immediately. It is imperative that companies assess their current exposure to these vulnerable versions and prioritize coordinated patch management strategies to dramatically reduce the potential attack surface.
Workaround and Mitigation
Immediate remediation strategies remain the most effective means of mitigating the risks posed by CVE-2025-24118. Organizations are advised to conduct rapid and comprehensive patch management activities. In practice, this entails upgrading all vulnerable iPadOS installations to version 17.7.4, updating macOS Sequoia systems to version 15.3, and ensuring every instance of macOS Sonoma is transitioned to version 14.7.3. Although these updates provide a comprehensive fix, the complexity of kernel exploitation necessitates continuous monitoring. Advanced mitigation measures involve enhancing system monitoring protocols to detect anomalous process scheduling behavior, unexpected termination events, or uncharacteristic writes to kernel memory. Complementary strategies include the deployment of host-based intrusion detection systems alongside integrity monitoring tools specifically tailored to observe kernel-level activity. Additionally, a thorough system inventory is critical, and organizations are encouraged to adopt configuration control measures to limit the installation and operation of unnecessary third-party kernel extensions. Incident response protocols should evolve to incorporate enhanced logging and precise temporal resolution to quickly identify and isolate any exploitation attempts. Finally, periodic audits and simulated attack exercises must be performed to validate the effectiveness of the mitigation strategies implemented.
References
For detailed information on this vulnerability and related mitigations, professionals should refer to the National Vulnerability Database entry at https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-24118, consult the Apple Security Updates available at https://support.apple.com/en-us/122067, https://support.apple.com/en-us/122068, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/122069, review relevant sections of the MITRE ATT&CK Framework at https://attack.mitre.org, and stay informed by engaging with cybersecurity insights shared on trusted platforms such as LinkedIn and technical cybersecurity newsletters from organizations including CrowdStrike and FireEye.
Rescana is here for you
Rescana is dedicated to assisting organizations in managing third party risks through our comprehensive Third Party Risk Management (TPRM) platform. We help our customers remain resilient by integrating proactive risk assessments, detailed technical evaluations, and continuous monitoring to address vulnerabilities across their supply chain and operational environments. Our team is available to answer any questions you might have about this report or any other cybersecurity concerns at ops@rescana.com. We remain committed to providing expert guidance and actionable intelligence to help you navigate the evolving threat landscape.